When was the last time a video call failed because the picture wasn’t three-dimensional enough?
I’ll wait. Because that’s the question Google Beam is answering, and I’m not convinced anyone asked it. Google announced this week that Beam, its 3D telepresence system, is expanding to six countries — the U.S., Canada, the U.K., France, Germany, and Japan — with 18 partners in tow. It plugs into Google Meet and Zoom, so you’re not being asked to abandon your existing meeting stack. And Google says internal testing showed improved team connection.
That’s the news. Now let me tell you what I actually think about it.
What Google Is Actually Selling Here
Strip away the demo footage and Beam is a bet on a specific claim: that remote work’s biggest unsolved problem is presence. Not scheduling. Not meeting bloat. Not the fact that half your calendar is people reading slides aloud. Presence — the sense that the person on the other end is in the room with you.
It’s a defensible bet. Eye contact matters. Reading a room matters. Anyone who has tried to negotiate anything over a laptop webcam knows the medium flattens nuance in ways that cost you something. Google isn’t wrong that the problem exists.
The question is whether it’s the problem worth solving at this price point, and whether the fix has to be hardware.
The Meet And Zoom Integration Is The Smart Part
If there’s one detail in this announcement that signals Google learned something, it’s the Zoom support. Beam doesn’t demand you migrate your organization onto a proprietary island. You can sit in a Beam booth and join a call where everyone else is on a regular laptop.
That’s the difference between a product and a science project. Telepresence has a long graveyard of systems that only worked if both ends had the gear, which meant nobody bought the first one. Making Beam a better seat at an ordinary meeting, rather than a separate kind of meeting, is the only distribution strategy that has a chance.
Eighteen partners across six countries suggests Google understands the same thing about physical access. You don’t win a hardware category by selling units to headquarters. You win by making the thing findable.
Where I Get Skeptical
“Internal testing shows improved team connection” is doing a lot of work in this announcement, and it’s the kind of claim I’d flag on any product I review.
Improved compared to what? Measured how? Over what duration? Internal testing at Google means people who work at Google, using a Google product, in a Google building, being asked how they felt about it. I’m not accusing anyone of lying. I’m saying that’s a vibe check, not evidence, and the gap between those two things is where a lot of enterprise hardware goes to die.
The honest version of this claim is: early users report it feels better. Fine. It probably does. The demos look good and I have no reason to doubt that sitting across from a life-sized, properly lit, eye-contact-capable version of a colleague beats a webcam rectangle. What I don’t know is whether that improvement survives contact with actual business conditions — the third meeting of the day, the participant who joined from a phone, the booking conflict, the walk across the office to get to the booth.
The Real Test Is Boring
Every telepresence product in history has cleared the “does it feel impressive” bar. That’s the easy part. The hard parts are utilization and habit.
Utilization: does the booth get used every day, or does it become the expensive room nobody books because Meet on a laptop is right there and starts in four seconds? Convenience beats fidelity in office technology almost every time. That’s why the conference room speakerphone lost to everyone dialing in separately.
Habit: does a team change how it works because Beam exists? Do the conversations that used to require a flight now happen in a booth? If the answer is yes for even a handful of specific use cases — closing deals, difficult performance conversations, design reviews where you need to read six faces at once — the product has a real job. If it’s just nicer video, it’s a nicer version of something that already works well enough.
My Read
Beam is a genuinely interesting piece of engineering attached to an unproven business case, and the expansion announcement is Google buying itself the data to find out which. Six countries and 18 partners is how you generate real usage numbers from people who don’t work for you.
That’s the right move. It’s also an admission that the internal testing wasn’t enough to settle the question.
If you’re evaluating this for your company, the thing to measure isn’t whether the demo wows your leadership team. It will. Measure whether anyone books the room twice.
🕒 Published: