uBlock Origin is done in Chrome.
Not deprecated. Not degraded. Removed. Google has pulled Manifest V2 extensions from the Chrome Web Store, and the most effective content blocker most people have ever installed went with them. The workarounds that kept it limping along have been closed off too. If you’ve been ignoring the warning banners Chrome has been showing for months, this is the part where ignoring stops working.
What actually happened
The short version: Manifest V2 was the extension platform that let developers write extensions with real power over network requests. Manifest V3, its replacement, does not. Google has been walking this path for years, first with warnings, then with disabling extensions, and now with removal from the store entirely. Coverage from BleepingComputer, Android Authority, Cybernews, and Tech Times all lands on the same conclusion, which is that dynamic filtering in Chrome is over and there is no remaining escape hatch.
uBlock Origin’s development continues on Firefox. That is not a consolation prize, it is a relocation notice.
Why I care about this on an AI tools site
Because this is the same story I write about every week, just wearing a different jacket.
The pattern goes like this. A platform gets popular by being open. Developers build things on it that the platform owner did not anticipate and does not benefit from. The platform owner then ships a new version of the API that happens to make those things impossible, framed as a security and performance improvement. Users are told the change is for their own good. The extension that made the platform better for people, and worse for the platform’s business model, quietly stops existing.
If you use AI agents, coding assistants, or any tool that plugs into somebody else’s ecosystem, you have seen this movie’s opening credits. Every agent that depends on a browser automation API, a model provider’s endpoint, or a plugin surface owned by a company with its own revenue targets is one API version away from the uBlock Origin problem. The tool does not have to be shut down. It just has to be built on a foundation that gets renovated out from under it.
That is the actual lesson here, and it is not really about ads.
The honest read on Google’s reasoning
To be fair, Manifest V3 does have a real argument behind it. Extensions with broad access to network traffic are a genuine security surface, and plenty of shady extensions have abused exactly that access. A permission model with tighter limits is not an unreasonable idea in isolation.
The problem is that the company making the call also sells ads. When the party writing the rules has a direct financial interest in one specific outcome of those rules, you do not get to claim the outcome was incidental. Google may well have security reasons. It also has revenue reasons. Both things can be true, and only one of them gets mentioned in the blog posts.
What to do about it
Practical options, ranked by how much they actually solve:
- Switch to Firefox for browsing where blocking matters. uBlock Origin development continues there. This is the option that keeps the tool you actually wanted.
- Use a Chromium browser that has not followed Google’s timeline. Some forks have kept MV2 support alive longer. Understand that this is a delay, not a fix, and that you are now trusting a smaller team with your browser security updates.
- Accept the MV3 replacements and lower your expectations. They block things. They do not block things the way you are used to.
- Move blocking below the browser. Network-level or DNS-level filtering does not care what Chrome’s extension API allows, though it also cannot do the page-level work an in-browser blocker does.
The part that should change how you pick tools
Stop evaluating tools purely on features. Start evaluating them on who controls the ground they stand on.
uBlock Origin was, by any measure, excellent software. Free, effective, well maintained, beloved. None of that mattered, because none of that was the deciding variable. The deciding variable was that it lived inside a product owned by a company with a conflicting interest, and no amount of quality survives that.
When I review an AI agent or a workflow tool, the question I keep coming back to is what happens to it when its host platform changes the rules. Can you export your data? Is there an open standard underneath? Does the vendor have an incentive to keep you or an incentive to keep you dependent? Those questions feel abstract and paranoid right up until the day the store listing disappears.
Chrome users just got a live demonstration. The extension was good. The ground was not.
🕒 Published:
Related Articles
- AI Companies Are Releasing Models They Admit Are Dangerous — And Calling It Progress
- Your Voice Is the Keyboard Now — Which App Actually Deserves to Hear It
- Tarificação do Assistente de Codificação IA: O que as Mudanças Significam para Você
- Nvidia Sees Three More Years of Sunshine, Morningstar Packed an Umbrella