Zero. That’s the number of governments you want deciding what you can and can’t see online. Yet, the UK is flirting with a move that could put them squarely in that category, joining “Government Controlled states” by restricting VPNs for those under 18. Mozilla, a name synonymous with open internet, is not having it. And frankly, neither should you.
The Privacy Shield Under Threat
Mozilla has made its position clear: VPNs are vital privacy and security tools. This isn’t some niche tech-bro opinion; it’s a fundamental truth in the digital age. They aren’t just for hiding your torrenting habits, despite what some might think. VPNs hide your IP address, protecting your location and your identity. This isn’t just about avoiding targeted ads; it’s about basic digital hygiene.
The UK’s consultation is weighing age-gating VPNs as a method to prevent minors from getting around age assurance systems under the Online Safety Act. On the surface, it sounds like a good-faith effort to protect children. But the road to digital dystopia is paved with good intentions. Mozilla points out that mandatory age verification or VPN restrictions directly undermine online privacy and security, and people’s ability to express themselves freely. It’s a trade-off, and the cost is far too high.
More Than Just Browsing
Let’s be real: VPNs are everywhere. Every corporation uses a VPN network to protect its internal data. Router manufacturers build them into firmware so you can safely access your home network from anywhere. This isn’t some fringe technology; it’s a fundamental building block of secure internet use for literally everyone. To pretend otherwise, or to suggest that certain demographics don’t need this basic layer of protection, is wilfully ignorant.
The argument that minors will use VPNs to bypass age restrictions misses a larger point. It assumes that the only reason anyone under 18 would use a VPN is for nefarious purposes. This is a naive and dangerous assumption. Young people, like adults, have a right to privacy. They may use VPNs to protect themselves from tracking, to access educational content that might be geo-restricted, or simply to feel safer online. Denying them these tools doesn’t make them safer; it makes them more vulnerable.
The Slippery Slope of Control
When a government starts dictating who can use what internet tools, it’s a very short step to dictating what content can be accessed. Mozilla explicitly states that such restrictions “undermine user privacy and security” and that protecting VPNs is essential to “maintain the open web.” That’s not hyperbole; it’s a warning based on how censorship and control typically evolve in the digital space.
The solution to online harm isn’t to disarm users of their privacy tools. It’s to address the “roots of online harm,” as Mozilla suggests. This means better education, stronger platforms, and genuine efforts to make the internet a safer space, rather than resorting to blunt instruments that punish everyone in the name of protecting a few. When you start limiting access to fundamental security tools, you create more problems than you solve.
Mozilla’s stand isn’t just about VPNs; it’s about the kind of internet we want to live in. Do we want an internet where governments decide what tools we can use based on our age, or do we want an open web where individuals have the right to protect their privacy and security? The answer should be obvious.
🕒 Published: